Software security is the practice of creating and maintaining software so it resists misuse, tampering, and outages. It focuses on preventing attackers or mistakes from turning a useful program into a liability.
Because software runs everything—from hospitals to payment systems—and vulnerabilities have real-world consequences. Weak software can cause data breaches, ransomware, service outages, regulatory fines, and reputational damage. Teams that treat security as a feature rather than an afterthought greatly reduce that risk.
Software security protects the code and services themselves; cybersecurity covers networks, endpoints, and overall defenses. Both are necessary: a strong perimeter won’t help if an app has a serious logic or input‑validation flaw. Make secure design part of your security program, not an optional add‑on.
Start with security at design, then test and maintain continuously.
A layered approach shrinks your attack surface. Typical toolsets include SAST for pre‑commit scanning, DAST for running apps, SCA for dependency checks, and automated patching and monitoring to catch anomalies quickly. Combining these with strong processes is far more effective than any single tool.
Software security is the broad program; application security zooms in on individual apps and their user interactions. Treat application security as a key part of the wider software‑security strategy.
Find practical checks and monitoring options at Palisade to improve your software security posture. Visit Palisade for tools and guides.
Start with a threat model and secure design review. Identify assets, likely threats, and how attackers would exploit them before coding begins. That upfront work clarifies priorities and reduces costly rework later.
Scan continuously as part of CI/CD and run scheduled full scans regularly. Automated scans on each commit catch regressions, while deeper periodic scans and pen tests find complex or logic flaws.
They can be if not managed—use SCA tools to monitor known vulnerabilities. Track dependency versions, apply updates, and remove unused libraries to limit supply‑chain exposure.
Yes—education reduces common mistakes like improper input validation and credential handling. Regular, practical training makes secure patterns routine and improves review outcomes.
Patching fixes discovered problems; proactive security prevents many problems from appearing. Both are required: proactive design reduces the number of patches, and timely patching reduces the window attackers have to exploit bugs.