Glossary

How are identity threats evolving against Google Workspace in 2025?

Published on
October 2, 2025

How are identity threats evolving against Google Workspace in 2025?

Identity attacks are now the main risk for Google Workspace — and they’ve become more targeted, persistent, and subtle. Security teams must treat identity control and OAuth governance as core defenses rather than add-ons. Below we break the changes down into short Q&A pairs so IT teams and MSPs can scan, act, and brief stakeholders quickly.

Identity threats image

Quick Q&A: Core trends and what they mean

1. What major shifts are we seeing in Google Workspace attacks?

Identity-focused techniques have overtaken broad phishing campaigns as the dominant approach. Attackers now combine OAuth consent manipulation, service-account abuse, and credential stuffing to create long‑lived access. These methods let adversaries operate using legitimate tokens or permissions, which reduces noisy alerts. For IT teams, that means traditional email filtering and legacy auth blocks are necessary but not sufficient. Defenses should prioritize application consent audits and least-privilege enforcement.

2. How big is the increase in identity-based attacks?

Threat telemetry in 2025 shows a sharp rise in identity attacks, with many environments seeing more than a 100% year‑over‑year increase. OAuth-related incidents lead growth, driven by consent phishing and malicious apps that escalate scopes over time. Legacy authentication continues to be a frequent target for credential stuffing and automated logins. Organizations that have removed basic auth and tightened app approvals see far fewer compromises. Rapid detection and targeted controls cut dwell time dramatically.

3. What makes OAuth abuse so effective?

OAuth abuse lets attackers gain authorized access without stealing passwords, using consent flows to get tokens that look legitimate. Small-scope requests are used first, then permissions are increased either by user re‑consent or app misconfiguration. Because access is token-based, it can be persistent and harder for typical SIEM rules to flag. Regularly reviewing granted apps and restricting third-party app installs reduces this vector substantially. Automated app discovery and user education are also vital.

4. Is multi-factor authentication still reliable?

MFA remains valuable but its effectiveness depends on the method used. Phishing-forward and adversary‑in‑the‑middle attacks make SMS and some soft-token methods vulnerable. Hardware-backed FIDO2 keys show the best resistance to bypass attempts and should be prioritized for admin and high‑value users. Deploy layered authentication where possible and retire SMS-based MFA for critical accounts. Training and adaptive access policies help make MFA a stronger deterrent.

5. How dangerous is legacy authentication?

Legacy protocols like basic auth are a high-risk target because they bypass modern token protections and often accept username/password pairs directly. Environments that still allow these protocols experience much higher rates of automated credential stuffing. Disabling legacy auth or enforcing modern OAuth-only flows cuts a common automated path for attackers. When shutdown isn’t immediate, the next best step is to require app passwords be removed and monitor authentication logs closely. Combine this with IP and device baselining to detect anomalies.

6. What about external Drive sharing and data leaks?

External sharing misuse is a frequent exfiltration method — attackers create or abuse sharing links that persist unnoticed for days. Many incidents happen outside business hours to minimize detection. Monitoring sharing changes, applying time‑limited links, and enforcing strict sharing defaults dramatically reduce exposure. Automated scans for newly externalized content and alerts on mass downloads catch most rapid exfiltration attempts. User awareness and regular review of shared files remain practical defenses.

7. Are specific attacker groups targeting Google Workspace?

Certain advanced actors have tailored tools and playbooks for Workspace consoles, focusing on admin privilege escalation and service accounts. These groups exploit organizational hierarchy and weak admin hygiene to gain persistent footholds. Attribution data shows diverse origin points with varied techniques, so defenses must be broad and not rely on one regional pattern. Harden admin consoles, separate duties, and enforce MFA and hardware keys for any privileged account. Regular privilege audits close many of these tailored attack paths.

8. How quickly can an account takeover be operationalized?

Once attackers gain token or credential access, they often move very quickly — sometimes within hours — to create persistence and expand access. Techniques like token refresh abuse, service account impersonation, and stealthy app registrations shorten the window for detection. Fast response playbooks that include token revocation, app removal, and credential resets are essential. Use automated playbooks to revoke suspicious OAuth grants and to force password and session invalidation. The faster you cut tokens off, the less damage an attacker can cause.

9. What immediate steps should IT teams take?

Start by auditing OAuth app grants, disabling legacy auth, and enforcing strong MFA for administrative users. Implement least‑privilege for service accounts and remove long‑dormant admin accounts. Deploy monitoring rules for unusual app consent, mass external sharing, and off‑hours large downloads. Use automation to revoke suspicious tokens and to quarantine compromised accounts. For hands-on help, consider reaching out to Palisade’s Google Workspace security tools at Palisade to speed up audits and remediation.

10. How can MSPs protect client tenants effectively?

MSPs should centralize visibility across client tenants, standardize consent and app approval policies, and enforce FIDO2 for all admin-level users. Offer automated scans of OAuth grants and legacy auth settings as part of routine checks. Build response templates to revoke access and reset sessions quickly when issues appear. Train client admins on app vetting and sharing hygiene. Regular reporting and a clear runbook turn reactive incidents into manageable events.

11. Which detection signals are most useful?

Look for unusual app grant increases, token refresh requests from new locations, and large data transfers outside business hours. Correlate auth anomalies with admin console changes and service account activity. Set thresholds for mass external sharing and automated download spikes. Use behavioral baselining so anomalous patterns raise prioritized alerts rather than noisy low‑value events. Enrich logs with device and IP reputation feeds for faster triage.

12. What longer-term changes reduce identity risk?

Shift to a zero‑trust mindset: assume tokens and accounts can be compromised and build controls around continuous verification. Adopt hardware MFA for high‑risk roles, harden service account permissions, and implement short-lived tokens where possible. Keep a tight app approval process and automate revocation for orphaned access. Invest in identity threat detection products and integrate them into your SOC workflows. Ongoing training and clean admin practices prevent many common escalations.

Quick Takeaways

  • Identity attacks are now the primary threat to Google Workspace — treat identity as the front line.
  • OAuth consent abuse can give attackers legitimate-looking access that evades simple detections.
  • Disable legacy authentication and stop SMS-based MFA for admin users to cut common compromise paths.
  • Use FIDO2 hardware keys and least-privilege service accounts for durable protection.
  • Automate app audits, token revocation, and off-hours monitoring to reduce dwell time.

Five short FAQs

Q1: Can OAuth consent phishing be prevented?

A1: You can greatly reduce it by restricting third‑party app installs, using allowlists, and running regular reviews of granted permissions. Automated discovery tools help find risky apps quickly. Educate users to question unexpected consent prompts and implement consent screens that require admin approval for sensitive scopes. Combine that with rapid revocation automation to limit impact.

Q2: Should I block all legacy authentication now?

A2: If business systems allow it, yes — disabling legacy auth is one of the fastest risk reductions. When immediate removal is not possible, enforce mitigations like limiting allowed IPs and removing app passwords. Monitor attempted basic auth logins and prioritize high‑risk accounts for migration.

Q3: Are service accounts a major risk?

A3: Service accounts can be high risk if they retain broad permissions and long-lived credentials. Rotate keys, apply least privilege, and audit their use regularly. Where possible, use short-lived credentials and separate duties so a single service account compromise has minimal blast radius.

Q4: What’s the most effective MFA strategy?

A4: Prioritize hardware-backed MFA (FIDO2) for privileged users and combine it with adaptive access policies for the rest of the org. Phase out SMS-based methods and harden authenticator apps with device attestation. Use risk‑based prompts to limit interruption while maintaining strong protections.

Q5: How do I monitor external sharing at scale?

A5: Automate scanning for newly externalized files and set alerts for mass downloads or new external link creation. Apply default restrictions on sharing and use time-limited links by policy. Integrate these alerts into your incident response workflows so sharing anomalies are triaged quickly.

Email Performance Score
Improve results with AI- no technical skills required
More Knowledge Base