.png)
A SYN packet is the initial TCP message that starts a reliable connection. It’s essential for normal web traffic and a common target for denial-of-service attacks. This article explains how SYN packets work, how attackers abuse them with SYN flood attacks, and practical detection and defense steps.
A SYN packet is the first message in the TCP three-way handshake used to open a reliable connection. It contains a SYN flag and an initial sequence number so both endpoints can synchronize state. Only TCP uses SYN packets — UDP and other stateless protocols don’t. In normal traffic, SYNs are routine and short-lived; in attacks, they’re the first sign something’s wrong.
The handshake follows three steps: the client sends SYN, the server replies with SYN-ACK, and the client completes the exchange with ACK. This exchange sets initial sequence numbers and establishes connection state on both systems. Without that handshake, TCP won’t transmit payload data reliably. Monitoring each step helps spot abnormalities early.
A SYN flood overloads a target by sending large numbers of SYN packets without completing the handshake. Each incomplete SYN forces the server to reserve resources while it waits for the final ACK. If enough half-open connections accumulate, the server can no longer accept legitimate traffic and performance degrades or services fail. Attackers may spoof source addresses to make mitigation harder.
SYN floods exploit the server’s need to hold state for pending connections. Resources like connection tables and memory are finite, and the protocol requires the server to track sequence numbers until the handshake finishes or times out. Poorly configured systems or default timeouts make it easier for attackers to tie up capacity. Modern defenses reduce risk, but they’re not foolproof against very large or distributed attacks.
Monitor SYN rates and look for sudden spikes or unusual distributions of source IPs and target ports. Establish a baseline of normal SYN traffic so deviations stand out. Use packet captures, flow telemetry, or IDS appliances to see patterns like many SYNs with no ACKs, repeated SYNs from spoofed ranges, or concentrated attacks against a single service. Early detection narrows response time and limits impact.
Effective defenses include enabling SYN cookies, applying rate-limiting, and deploying network-level filtering via firewalls or DDoS scrubbing services. SYN cookies let servers avoid storing per-connection state until the handshake finishes. Rate limiting slows the flow of new connections from the same source or network. For large attacks, cloud scrubbing or ISP-level filtering may be necessary.
SYN cookies let the server avoid allocating resources for incomplete handshakes by encoding state inside the SYN-ACK sequence number. When the client returns the ACK, the server can validate the encoded state and then create the real connection entry. They’re a low-overhead mitigation that works well for many scenarios but can have compatibility limits with some TCP extensions. Most modern OS kernels support SYN cookies as a configuration option.
You should investigate when SYN rates jump dramatically, when many SYNs never reach ACK, or when SYNs target unusual ports. Regular port scans and reconnaissance often begin with SYNs, so an uptick can indicate probing. Also pay attention to sudden increases on public-facing services like HTTPS (TCP 443), which are common targets. Acting quickly prevents small events from becoming major outages.
Packet analyzers (e.g., Wireshark), flow collectors (NetFlow/sFlow), host-based logs, and network IDS/IPS can all surface SYN anomalies. SIEM platforms aggregate alerts and telemetry to show trends over time. For operational teams, combining flow data with packet captures gives context — who’s knocking, where they’re coming from, and which services are affected. For managed detection, consider Palisade’s services and monitoring tools at Palisade.
Imagine a public portal on TCP 443 that starts accepting far fewer connections. Monitoring shows thousands of SYNs per second without matching ACKs, and the server’s connection table fills. Responders enable SYN cookies, apply rate limits, and work with the ISP to block obvious malicious ranges. The portal remains available while analysts trace the attack — a straightforward win for SYN visibility and quick mitigation.
A: No single control guarantees complete prevention, but layered defenses (SYN cookies, rate limiting, filtering, and cloud scrubbing) greatly reduce impact. Preparedness and fast detection are critical.
A: SYN cookies are generally safe and transparent for most clients, but they can interfere with certain TCP extensions like large windows or unusual options. Test before enabling in complex environments.
A: Detecting within seconds to a few minutes is ideal; faster detection reduces collateral damage. Automate alerts for deviations from your SYN baseline to shorten response time.
A: Yes — they remain a common DoS method because they’re simple and effective against unprepared targets. Large-scale botnets and spoofing techniques keep them viable.
A: For tools and monitoring services that help with SYN visibility, visit Palisade for more resources and support.
.svg)
