Glossary

How can Entra ID app registrations be abused for long-term persistence?

Published on
October 2, 2025

Overview

Service principals created during app registration can become long-term footholds if misconfigured; attackers exploit them to maintain access. Below we answer common questions security teams face and lay out concrete detection and remediation steps.

Questions & Answers

1. What is the simplest way attackers persist using Entra ID app registrations?

They create or compromise an app registration and keep a long-lived secret or certificate for a service principal. With that credential an attacker can request tokens and access resources without interactive logins. Because secrets often have long expirations, this access can last until the credential is revoked. Detection is harder when activity uses legitimate APIs and produces low noise. Effective defenses include credential rotation, constrained permissions, and continuous monitoring.

2. How do App Objects differ from Enterprise Applications (service principals)?

App Objects hold the application’s configuration and metadata; Enterprise Applications are tenant-specific service principal instances that receive permissions and role assignments. The App Object is a global template, while each tenant using the app has its own service principal. Credentials and permissions tied to the application can be used by its service principals. Both sides need governance: remove orphaned principals and revoke stale credentials to prevent misuse.

3. Which permission types matter for abuse scenarios?

Application permissions are more dangerous for persistence because they allow app-only auth without any user present. Delegated permissions need a signed-in user and are limited by that user’s scope. An app with Application permissions can act programmatically across the tenant and often with broader reach. Attackers prefer Application permissions for stealthy, long-term automation. Limit app permissions to least privilege and require admin review for high-scope consent.

4. Can user consent create a persistent backdoor?

Yes—user consent grants delegated access that attackers can abuse, especially when a privileged user is tricked into consenting. Delegated tokens inherit the consenting user’s privileges, so social engineering or phishing can elevate risk. Attackers may craft convincing consent flows to get users to approve an app. Restrict which users can consent and monitor consent grants; require admin consent for sensitive scopes to reduce risk.

5. How do certificates and client secrets change the risk profile?

Secrets and certificates are the credentials that authenticate an app; long lifetimes or poor storage make them persistence tools for attackers. Secrets are easy to leak; certificates are harder but still effective if left valid. If an attacker obtains a credential, they can request tokens for the credential’s lifetime. Enforce short lifetimes, store credentials in a vault, and rotate them automatically to shrink the window of exposure.

6. Are Enterprise Application permissions stronger than an admin role?

Not exactly—but a service principal with broad Application permissions can have impact equal to or exceeding an admin account. Role assignments and Application permissions operate independently of user roles, so a misconfigured principal can act with tenant-wide privileges. Treat service principals like privileged accounts: review, limit, and monitor them. Apply just-in-time controls and conditional access where available.

7. How do attackers find target app registrations?

They enumerate applications via Graph API calls, public metadata, or leaked configuration files and repos. Exposed manifests or CI/CD pipelines often reveal app IDs and sometimes credentials. Once attackers have an app ID, they probe for credentials or weak owner processes to establish persistence. Remove public metadata where possible and scan repos for secrets to reduce reconnaissance success.

8. What detection signals indicate service principal abuse?

Unusual token requests, API activity at odd hours, and principals with rarely-used owners are strong indicators. Look for sudden spikes in API calls, new long-lived credentials, or unexpected permission grants. Correlate Azure AD sign-ins, audit logs, and Microsoft Graph activity to profile normal behavior and spot anomalies. Alert on credential creation, admin consent events, and principals performing admin-level actions to improve detection.

9. How should teams respond when they find an abused app registration?

Disable or remove the service principal, revoke credentials, and rotate related secrets immediately to cut attacker access. Investigate scope: which resources, permissions, and accounts were affected. Harden permissions, remove unnecessary consents, and rotate any compromised admin credentials. Update governance controls—restrict who can register apps, require approvals, and add monitoring—then document lessons learned.

10. What remediation steps prevent future persistence via app registrations?

Use least-privilege for app permissions, enforce short-lived credentials, and prefer managed identities where possible. Require admin approval for high-risk scopes and limit who can register apps or consent. Centralize secrets in a vault with automated rotation and avoid embedding credentials in code. Add continuous monitoring and automated alerts for registration and credential events, and run periodic cleanup of unused principals.

11. How do managed identities change the attack surface?

Managed identities remove static credentials by delegating credential handling to the cloud provider, reducing leaked-secret risks. They’re bound to resources and scoped by the platform, which limits cross-tenant misuse. Misassigned roles on a managed identity still pose risk, so apply least-privilege role assignments. Prefer managed identities for in-cloud workloads and monitor their usage closely.

12. What policy controls help reduce app registration abuse?

Restrict who can register apps, require admin consent for sensitive permissions, and apply conditional access to principals. Use entitlement management and access reviews to keep owners and permissions current. Enforce credential lifetimes, block legacy auth flows, and automate approval gates for new registrations. Governance turns ad hoc registrations into managed identities with oversight.

13. Which tooling and audit sources should defenders rely on?

Use Azure AD audit and sign-in logs, Microsoft Graph activity, and cloud resource logs for a complete picture of service principal behavior. Integrate identity telemetry into your SIEM to alert on token issuance, consent events, and secret creation. Inventory apps and map app objects to service principals and owners, and scan code repositories for exposed credentials. Palisade offers tools and checks to validate configurations and find weak spots: Palisade.

14. What quick checks can teams implement right away?

List service principals, identify those with Application permissions, and find long-lived credentials. Restrict app registration to a small admin group, enforce short secret lifetimes, and remove unused principals. Enable alerts for credential creation and admin consent events, and run a scoped red-team exercise to validate detection. These low-friction steps significantly reduce risk.

15. How should organizations balance security and developer agility?

Favor least-privilege and safe automation: give apps only necessary permissions and centralize secrets in vaults. Offer secure templates and approval workflows to developers to avoid shadow IT. Periodically review permissions and owners, and require additional approvals for tenant-wide or high-privilege scopes. Secure-by-default patterns keep agility without sacrificing protection.


Quick Takeaways

  • Treat service principals as privileged accounts and protect them accordingly.
  • Application permissions allow app-only access and must be tightly controlled.
  • Rotate credentials often and prefer managed identities to reduce static secrets.
  • Limit app registration and user consent; require admin approval for risky scopes.
  • Monitor audit/sign-in logs and alert on credential creation and unusual token activity.
  • Regularly audit and remove unused service principals to reduce attack surface.

FAQs

How fast can an attacker gain persistence?

Often within minutes if they can register an app or obtain a credential; persistence lasts until credentials are revoked or rotated. Rapid detection and immediate remediation are critical to limit impact.

Can conditional access stop all service principal attacks?

No—conditional access helps but isn’t a complete solution. It should be combined with permission limits, credential controls, and monitoring to be effective.

Should we delete old app registrations?

Yes—remove unused app registrations and principals after checking dependencies and documenting changes. Back up any required configuration before deletion.

Is migration to managed identities always possible?

Not always; some third-party integrations need app registrations. Migrate in-cloud workloads to managed identities where feasible and plan for exceptions carefully.

Who manages app registration governance?

Identity and access management teams should lead governance, supported by application owners and cloud ops. Governance requires enforcement, automation, and regular reviews to remain effective.

For automated checks and guidance, visit Palisade.

Email Performance Score
Improve results with AI- no technical skills required
More Knowledge Base