Glossary

How does cyberwarfare shape infrastructure and civilian life during armed conflicts?

Published on
October 2, 2025

Introduction

Cyber operations during armed conflicts can disrupt essential services, influence political outcomes, and erode public confidence within hours. Governments and civilian organizations face a mix of sabotage, espionage, and information campaigns aimed at weakening an adversary’s capacity and will to respond.

Illustration of cyberwarfare impact

Q&A: Key questions about cyber conflict

1. What does cyberwarfare target first in a conflict?

Attackers typically aim at critical infrastructure immediately—power grids, communications, and financial systems. Disabling these services creates cascading failures that affect hospitals, transport, and emergency response. The goal is often to paralyze daily life and force political pressure. Attacks may be brief but timed to maximize disruption. Defenders should prioritize resilience and fast recovery plans.

2. How do cyberattacks affect decision-makers?

Cyber operations can skew information and access, putting leaders under pressure to make rushed choices. Tactics include taking down government portals, stealing sensitive data for leverage, or flooding officials with false reports. These moves can change negotiation dynamics and public perception. Robust secure communications and verified intelligence are vital countermeasures. Training staff to recognize manipulation reduces the chance of impulsive responses.

3. Can cyberwarfare cause long-term physical damage?

Yes — targeted intrusions into industrial control systems can damage equipment and infrastructure over time. For example, attacks on energy management or water treatment systems can create unsafe operating conditions that harm machinery and people. Even if initial disruption is temporary, the recovery can be expensive and slow. Preventive monitoring and segmented networks help limit damage. Long-term planning should include asset replacement and forensic investigation.

4. How do attackers use social engineering in conflicts?

Manipulating people is often easier than breaking protected networks, so social engineering is a frontline tactic. Phishing, voice scams, and deceptive posts on social platforms collect credentials and spread false narratives. Such campaigns can persuade citizens to reveal personal data or unknowingly assist hostile operations. Regular education, simulated phishing tests, and strict verification protocols cut the success rate dramatically. Organizations should also monitor public channels for emerging social campaigns.

5. Are communication providers a special risk?

Yes — if a telecom or cloud provider is compromised, attackers gain wide visibility and access to user data. Breaches at scale enable location tracking, call interception, and bulk data harvesting. That exposure can be weaponized for espionage or targeted operations. Strong vendor risk management, encryption, and multi-factor authentication help reduce this threat. Regular audits and quick breach notification protocols are essential.

6. How do misinformation campaigns fit into cyberwarfare?

Misinformation and disinformation are tools to undermine trust and create confusion among civilians. Coordinated false stories or doctored media can erode confidence in institutions and push public opinion in favor of an attacker’s goals. The harm is often psychological, but it can translate into political pressure and real-world consequences. Fact-checking, transparent communication, and trusted spokespeople are effective counters. Tech platforms and authorities should collaborate to limit spread.

7. What immediate steps should organizations take when a conflict starts?

Start by securing critical accounts and increasing monitoring—this is the fastest way to reduce exposure. Implement emergency response playbooks, isolate sensitive systems, and ensure backups are offline and intact. Communicate clear instructions to staff and lock down privileges where possible. Engage external response partners if needed. Regular tabletop exercises make these actions faster and less error-prone.

8. How important is cyber resilience compared to offense?

Defense and resilience are equally crucial: preventing attacks is ideal, but rapid recovery protects lives and services just as much. Resilience planning focuses on redundancy, quick failover, and clear recovery priorities for essential systems. Offensive capabilities can deter some threats, but they don’t replace robust defenses. Investing in detection, incident response, and cross-sector coordination yields the best protection. Public-private partnerships amplify resilience across critical sectors.

9. Who should lead cybersecurity in wartime?

Leadership should be a coordinated effort between national authorities, critical infrastructure operators, and trusted private partners. Governments provide strategic direction and intelligence, while operators implement technical defenses and recovery. Clear roles, legal frameworks, and information-sharing channels make coordination effective. Regular joint exercises build trust and speed. Palisade recommends structured collaboration between sectors to reduce response times.

10. How can civilians protect themselves online during a conflict?

Civilians should prioritize basic cyber hygiene: unique passwords, multi-factor authentication, and careful handling of messages from unknown sources. Limit sharing of real-time locations and avoid reposting unverified claims. Keep devices updated and back up important data offline. If you rely on cloud services, confirm recovery options with providers. Being cautious online reduces individual risk and the chance of contributing to larger campaigns.

11. What role does intelligence-gathering play in cyber operations?

Intelligence is central: information about networks, personnel, and vulnerabilities guides where attackers focus efforts. Espionage operations can harvest credentials, design tailored attacks, and map critical dependencies. That data shapes both sabotage and influence campaigns. Strong counterintelligence and monitoring of anomalous access patterns help defenders spot early probes. Sharing threat intelligence across organizations limits the window of opportunity for attackers.

12. How should countries and companies prepare over the long term?

Long-term preparation means hardening infrastructure, investing in skilled defenders, and building legal and diplomatic tools to deter abuse. Standards for critical systems, mandatory incident reporting, and cross-border cooperation reduce systemic risk. Workforce development and public awareness campaigns expand the defensive base. Regularly updated playbooks and technology refresh cycles maintain readiness. Palisade supports teams with practical tools and guidance to shore up email and communication security during high-risk periods.

Quick Takeaways

  • Cyberattacks in conflicts focus on critical services—power, comms, and finance—to cause rapid disruption.
  • Social engineering and misinformation amplify technical attacks by confusing people and decision-makers.
  • Resilience (redundancy, backups, rapid response) is as important as preventive defenses.
  • Coordinated action between governments, operators, and private partners reduces impact and recovery time.
  • Civilians should follow basic cyber hygiene to avoid becoming entry points for larger campaigns.

FAQs

Q: Can a cyberattack lead to physical casualties?

A: Yes. If attackers disrupt hospital systems, emergency services, or industrial controls, people can be harmed. Proper segmentation, fail-safe mechanisms, and backup procedures help prevent fatalities. Incident response plans must prioritize life-safety systems and restoration. Regular drills ensure responders act quickly under pressure.

Q: How fast can a cyber operation spread?

A: Very quickly — an automated campaign or malware can affect many systems within minutes or hours. Speed depends on the tools used and how interconnected systems are. Network segmentation and timely detection slow propagation. Rapid threat sharing shortens the window for successful attacks.

Q: Should companies disconnect from the internet during a nearby conflict?

A: Disconnecting can be a strong defensive move for some systems, but it’s not always practical. Organizations should assess which systems can safely be isolated without harming operations. Planned isolation, combined with secure remote access for critical staff, strikes a balance. Test isolation procedures ahead of time.

Q: How do we trust information during an active campaign of misinformation?

A: Rely on verified official channels, corroborated reports, and reputable sources. Cross-check claims before sharing and be skeptical of sensational content. Organizations should publish clear, frequent updates to counter false narratives. Media literacy training helps communities distinguish fact from fabrication.

Q: Where can teams get practical help to secure communications?

A: Palisade provides tools and resources to strengthen email and messaging practices across organizations. Start with basic protections—strong authentication, encryption where available, and strict access controls. Regular audits and continuous monitoring reveal weaknesses before they’re exploited. For email-specific checks, use Palisade’s tools to assess and improve your settings: https://palisade.email/.

Email Performance Score
Improve results with AI- no technical skills required
More Knowledge Base